If you prioritize higher screen resolution and digital photo editing, the Dell Alienware AW2723DF with its larger screen and wider color gamut will better serve your needs, though it comes at a higher cost. For competitive gaming, both monitors offer high refresh rates and low response times, but the Dell Alienware's slightly higher refresh rate may not justify its price if budget is a concern. The ViewSonic XG2431, being less expensive, provides good gaming performance and adequate photo editing capabilities but sacrifices screen size and resolution, which might affect your experience if you're also using it for productivity or media consumption. Both monitors aren't the best for HDR gaming or video editing due to their limited peak brightness and color volume. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.4/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
99.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
8.6/10
6.9/10
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
20 - 280 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
6.4/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$429
$245
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) has a price of $429 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Put all the pieces together, the high quality IPS image quality, the punchy backlight, the good response and the buttery smooth 280Hz refresh and you have a pretty outstanding gaming panel that's also decent for general computing duties thanks to the 1440p resolution."
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.