If budget is a concern and you engage in productivity tasks or casual gaming, the Dell Alienware monitor is a cost-effective option that offers a solid balance of features. For competitive gaming, its higher refresh capabilities make it a strong contender. However, it falls short in HDR performance and color accuracy compared to premium models. On the other hand, if you're willing to invest more for a top-tier visual experience, the MSI MEG is better suited for HDR gaming and media consumption, boasting superior color depth, contrast, and brightness, with a slight tradeoff in refresh rate for gaming. This monitor also excels in print photo editing with its wider color gamut and glossy screen enhancing image clarity. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Excellent for media consumption
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.4/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
99.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
8.6/10
5.1/10
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
7.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
20 - 280 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
6.4/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Glossy
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
9.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$429
$850
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) has a price of $429 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
"Put all the pieces together, the high quality IPS image quality, the punchy backlight, the good response and the buttery smooth 280Hz refresh and you have a pretty outstanding gaming panel that's also decent for general computing duties thanks to the 1440p resolution."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.