If competitive gaming is your top priority, the Dell Alienware monitor has a higher refresh rate and faster response time, which will result in smoother gameplay. But if you're looking for a sharper image and enjoy media consumption, the Gigabyte M32UC's larger screen with higher resolution will deliver a more immersive experience, though with a lower refresh rate meaning slightly less smooth action in fast-paced games. For productivity, the Gigabyte's larger and higher-resolution screen is beneficial for multitasking and editing detailed documents. Neither monitor is the best for HDR gaming or professional photo editing, as they don't reach high brightness levels or color gamuts needed for those activities. If you frequently view your screen off-angle, you may prefer the Dell's IPS panel for better color consistency than the Gigabyte's VA panel. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.4/10
7.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2776:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
506 nits
99.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.4 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is good for casual gaming, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
8.6/10
4.7/10
280Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
7.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.7 ms
20 - 280 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is poor.
Productivity
6.4/10
9.6/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
7.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1020:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2776:1
384 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
672 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
506 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is good for media consumption, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$429
$550
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) has a price of $429 and the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) costs $550.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and Gigabyte M32UC (VA) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32UC (VA) compare to other monitors
"Put all the pieces together, the high quality IPS image quality, the punchy backlight, the good response and the buttery smooth 280Hz refresh and you have a pretty outstanding gaming panel that's also decent for general computing duties thanks to the 1440p resolution."
"The Gigabyte M32UC is a terrific value. For around $600, you get a full-featured 4K gaming monitor with top-shelf video processing, a colorful bright image and a form factor suited for both work and play."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.