If competitive gaming is your top priority, the BenQ XL2566K offers excellent refresh rate and low response time, making it ideal for fast-paced games where every millisecond counts. However, it falls short for tasks like digital photo editing and media consumption due to its narrow color gamut and poor HDR capabilities. On the other hand, the Dell AW2524H, while also great for competitive gaming, provides better color accuracy and a wider color gamut, which makes it more suitable for tasks that require precise color representation, such as photo editing, but it isn't the best choice for HDR gaming and media consumption either. The Dell is usually less expensive, so if you're looking to save some money without compromising much on gaming performance, it's the more cost-effective choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the BenQ XL2566K (TN)
The BenQ XL2566K (TN) has no clear advantages over the Dell AW2524H (IPS).
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Good brightness
Key differences
Cost
$599
$500
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The BenQ XL2566K (TN) has a price of $599 and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) costs $500.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The BenQ XL2566K (TN) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
6.1/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
1131:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
303 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell AW2524H (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.2/10
9.5/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
5.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.5 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 500 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
303 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell AW2524H (IPS) to be best in class for competitive gaming, while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is excellent.
Productivity
4.8/10
4.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) and BenQ XL2566K (TN) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.1/10
5.4/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1131:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
303 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) and BenQ XL2566K (TN) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the BenQ XL2566K (TN) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the BenQ XL2566K (TN) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the BenQ XL2566K (TN) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the BenQ XL2566K (TN) and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) compare to other monitors
"It’s not for everyone in the same way that a top fuel dragster isn’t everyone’s perfect daily driver. The BenQ Zowie XL2566K succeeds in delivering the fastest, sharpest and smoothest display for pro FPS players and that’s all it wanted to do. Its other limitations and premium price tag mean it’s a bespoke tool for a niche market, rather than another general gaming monitor for those who like playing games."
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.