A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB273U F
Company ProductName Specs




G24-20
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for top-notch performance, the Asus XB273U F with its higher refresh rate and fast response would provide a great advantage. However, if you're on a budget and mainly indulge in casual gaming, the Lenovo G24-20 offers good gaming performance at a lower price. The Asus, with better color accuracy, is suitable for digital photo editing, and its larger size and higher resolution enhance productivity and media consumption. For everyday use and casual gaming, the Lenovo will suffice, but for serious gaming and multitasking, the Asus is superior at a higher cost. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
  • The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus XB273U F (IPS).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

7.0
XB273U F
G24-20
5.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
XB273U F
G24-20
5.7
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.7
XB273U F
G24-20
4.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.3
XB273U F
G24-20
5.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,100
XB273U F
G24-20
$195
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) costs $195.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB273U F
G24-20
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB273U F
G24-20
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB273U F
G24-20
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB273U F
G24-20
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus XB273U F (IPS)Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
Asus XB273U F (IPS)Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$195
Screen Size
27"24"
Resolution
2560 x 14401920 x 1080
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
360Hz165Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1242:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
488 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
468 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5.4 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 165 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
9.5/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI92 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7/106.2/10
Image Clarity Score
7/106.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo