If competitive gaming is your priority and you're willing to invest in the best experience, the Asus monitor offers an excellent refresh rate and response time, which can enhance fast-paced gameplay. For more casual use, including general productivity and media consumption, the Gigabyte monitor gives you a wider screen in an ultrawide format that's great for multitasking and immersive viewing, all at a more affordable price. However, for tasks that demand accurate colors, like digital photo editing, the Asus pulls ahead with better color fidelity. Neither monitor is the best pick for HDR gaming or video editing due to their limited brightness and color volume. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus XB273U F (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.0/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.5/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.5 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,100
$330
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) costs $330.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
6.7/10
6.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
Media Consumption
6.3/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.