A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·
If competitive gaming is a priority, the Asus monitor's higher refresh rate and faster response time will offer smoother gameplay, ideal for fast-paced games. However, if you're interested in a balance between gaming, productivity, and media viewing, the Gigabyte offers larger screen size and higher resolution, giving you more screen real estate and sharper images, but at a lower refresh rate. Both monitors have good color accuracy, so they're suitable for photo editing, though neither is the best for HDR video editing. The Asus has a slightly better contrast and brightness, making it more suitable for rooms with varying lighting conditions, but it comes at a premium price. If budget is a concern and you prefer a larger display, the Gigabyte may be more cost-effective while still providing a high-quality experience for various uses. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
- Good for casual gaming
- Best in class for competitive gaming
- Best in class refresh rate
- Good brightness
- Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
- Very good for productivity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.0
6.2
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
9.5
4.5
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.7
8.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$1,100
$650
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) costs $650.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Media Consumption
6.3
6.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus XB273U F (IPS) | Gigabyte M32U (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$1,100 | $650 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 16 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1242:1 | 1125:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 488 nits | 350 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 468 nits | 456 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 99.6 % | 99.8 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 5.4 ms | 7.1 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 240 Hz | 20 - 144 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 9.5/10 | 6.6/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.1/10 | 7.9/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 140 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Tom's Guide
Matthew Murray | June 2022
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. Gigabyte FO32U2 (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32U (IPS) vs. Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32U (IPS) vs. LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32U (IPS) vs. LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
