A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If competitive gaming is your priority, the ASUS XB273U F offers superior performance with a higher refresh rate, resulting in smoother gameplay, which justifies its higher cost. However, if budget is a concern and you're focused on casual gaming, general productivity, or content consumption, the Gigabyte M32Q provides a larger screen and decent gaming capabilities at a lower price, though it may not match the ASUS in response time or competitive gaming experience. Neither monitor is ideal for HDR gaming or professional video editing, but both are suitable for digital photo editing with good color accuracy. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
- Good for casual gaming
- Best in class for competitive gaming
- Best in class refresh rate
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
- Good brightness
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
- The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus XB273U F (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.0
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
460 nits
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.5
4.7
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 170 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.7
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.3
5.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
460 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,100
$455
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) costs $455.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus XB273U F (IPS) | Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$1,100 | $455 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 360Hz | 170Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1242:1 | 1195:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 488 nits | 333 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 468 nits | 460 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 99.6 % | 100.6 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 5.4 ms | 6.1 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 240 Hz | 20 - 170 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 9.5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
Shopping
Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Display Ninja
Rob Shafer | July 2023
"Thanks to its IPS panel with a wide color gamut and fast pixel response time speed, the Gigabyte M32Q offers both an immersive and responsive gaming experience. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, plenty of connectivity options, and a lot of useful features – all at a reasonable price."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus XB273U F (IPS) vs. Gigabyte CO49DQ (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
