A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB273U F
Company ProductName Specs




U3223QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If competitive gaming is a priority and you're willing to spend more, the Asus monitor with its higher refresh rate and better responsiveness will enhance your gaming experience. However, the Dell monitor offers a larger screen and higher resolution which is superior for productivity tasks and media consumption, and it comes at a lower cost. Keep in mind, though, for fast-paced gaming, the Dell's lower refresh rate and response time may not be ideal. Neither monitor is the best for HDR gaming or HDR video editing, so if those are critical needs, you might want to consider other options. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good for media consumption

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

7.0
XB273U F
U3223QE
6.2
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2104:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
438 nits
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.9 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
XB273U F
U3223QE
3.8
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
24.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is poor.

Productivity

6.7
XB273U F
U3223QE
7.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is good for productivity, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.3
XB273U F
U3223QE
7.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
2104:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
438 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is good for media consumption, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$1,100
XB273U F
U3223QE
$880
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) costs $880.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB273U F
U3223QE
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB273U F
U3223QE
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB273U F
U3223QE
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB273U F
U3223QE
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the Dell U3223QE (IPS Black) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus XB273U F (IPS)Dell U3223QE (IPS Black)
Asus XB273U F (IPS)Dell U3223QE (IPS Black)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$880
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS Black
Local Dimming Zones
N/A8

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1242:12104:1
SDR Peak Brightness
488 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
468 nits438 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5.4 ms24.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
9.5/105/10
Ghosting Score
8.1/105.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteSemi-Gloss
Text Clarity Score
7/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
21
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo