A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG49WCD
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a large and immersive display for gaming and media consumption with excellent color depth and contrast, and you're prepared to invest more, the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is a strong option, but its size may not suit all workspaces and may be less sharp for productivity due to its size and resolution spread across a wide screen. Conversely, the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is less expensive and offers a high-resolution display which is better for sharpness in productivity tasks and digital photo editing; however, its smaller size and lower refresh rate make it less optimal for immersive gaming experiences. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
6.9
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,026
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,026 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
9.7
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
5.9
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Media Consumption

9.6
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
9.5
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
No
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,026
$800
Screen Size
49"27"
Resolution
5120 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
144Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
413 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
468 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99.9 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 144 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI163 PPI
Coating
GlossyMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
10
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo