Considering the higher price, the Asus PG49WCD offers a wider screen and superior brightness, making it a strong choice for immersive gaming and media consumption. Its larger size and aspect ratio cater well to multitasking and productivity needs as well. The LG 34GS95QE, while less expensive, has a higher refresh rate and matte coating, reducing glare and suiting competitive gamers seeking smooth visuals. Both monitors boast OLED technology for deep blacks and vibrant colors, but the Asus has a slight edge in color accuracy, beneficial for digital photo editing. The LG's strengths lie in its balance of features for both gaming performance and everyday productivity. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
Best in class for media consumption
Good brightness
Best in class color volume
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
Very good refresh rate
Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
6.3/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.6/10
7.8/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$1,026
$1,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,026 and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,300.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.8/10
9.7/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
5.7/10
5.7/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.