A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG49WCD
Company ProductName Specs




34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

Considering the higher price, the Asus PG49WCD offers a wider screen and superior brightness, making it a strong choice for immersive gaming and media consumption. Its larger size and aspect ratio cater well to multitasking and productivity needs as well. The LG 34GS95QE, while less expensive, has a higher refresh rate and matte coating, reducing glare and suiting competitive gamers seeking smooth visuals. Both monitors boast OLED technology for deep blacks and vibrant colors, but the Asus has a slight edge in color accuracy, beneficial for digital photo editing. The LG's strengths lie in its balance of features for both gaming performance and everyday productivity. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
6.3
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.6
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
7.8
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,026
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
$1,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,026 and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,300.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
9.7
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.7
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
5.7
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
No
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
34GS95QE
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,026
$1,300
Screen Size
49"34"
Resolution
5120 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
144Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
413 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
468 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99.9 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 144 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI109 PPI
Coating
GlossyMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
12
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo