If you prioritize a larger, immersive display for high-end gaming and media, with excellent contrast and vibrant colors, the Asus PG49WCD with its wide screen and high refresh rate excels, but it falls short in productivity due to its size and shape. The Innocn 27M2V offers great color accuracy and a more conventional aspect ratio that's better for productivity tasks and still very good for gaming and media. It provides high performance at a lower cost but doesn't match the Asus's ultra-wide gaming experience. Choose the Innocn for a balance of work and play, or the Asus for a premium, gaming-centric monitor. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Best in class for productivity
Good refresh rate
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Very good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.8/10
8.2/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
80.2 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good.
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
5.9/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
5.7/10
9.9/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
164 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.6/10
8.3/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good.
Cost
$1,026
$730
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,026 and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $730.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Thanks to the wide color gamut, games and videos will look even more vibrant than the standard wide gamut displays (such as LG’s Nano IPS with 98% DCI-P3 and ~90% Adobe RGB, for instance), especially when it comes to blue, cyan and green shades. All in all, if you want a 27″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with a mini LED FALD backlight, the Innocn 27M2V is currently the best model available."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.