If you're a competitive gamer looking for high refresh rates and minimal ghosting for a smoother experience, the Asus PG27AQN would be an excellent fit, albeit at a higher cost. However, if budget is a concern and you also do digital photo editing, the MSI G273QPF offers good performance for casual gaming and color-critical work at a lower price, but it's not as well-suited for very fast-paced gaming. Neither of these monitors is ideal for HDR gaming or media consumption, so if those are priorities, you may want to consider other options. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Advantages of the MSI G273QPF (IPS)
The MSI G273QPF (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG27AQN (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.7/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
92.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming, though the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is somewhat better.
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
5.8/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
5.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.9 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$949
$244
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) has a price of $949 and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) costs $244.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI G273QPF (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
6.5/10
6.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1249:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
316 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and MSI G273QPF (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and the MSI G273QPF (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN is a motion clarity marvel. It’s the first 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor on the market, and also the first to use an Ultrafast IPS display. These advancements provide outstanding motion clarity across a broad range of refresh rates. Unfortunately, the monitor’s motion clarity does nothing for its image quality, which is just ok. To be clear, it’s a very nice looking monitor in many situations. However, the monitor’s contrast ratio is rather low. And while it can reach high levels of brightness in HDR, it lacks the nuance and contrast required to look great in HDR games."
"Thanks to its 27″ 1440p IPS panel with wide color gamut, the MSI G273QF delivers an immersive viewing experience, while the rapid 1ms GtG response time speed, FreeSync, MBR and 165Hz ensure buttery-smooth performance – all that at an appealing price!"
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.