A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·
Choosing between the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) depends on your priorities. If competitive gaming is your main focus and you want a fast refresh rate with minimal ghosting, the Asus offers a top-tier experience at a lower price. However, it's not ideal for HDR gaming and media consumption due to lower HDR peak brightness and contrast. On the other hand, the LG excels in delivering stunning visuals for HDR content due to its infinite contrast ratio and is also suitable for print photo editing. Yet, it's costlier and doesn't match the Asus in terms of competitive gaming performance due to a lesser refresh rate and higher response time. For productivity and media consumption, the LG provides a larger screen and better resolution, making it a better choice if those are your main activities and you're willing to invest more. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
- Best in class for competitive gaming
- Best in class refresh rate
- Good text clarity
- Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
- Best in class for casual gaming
- Good for productivity
- Very good for media consumption
- Best in class contrast
- Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.7
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
92.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
9.5
6.2
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
5.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.0
8.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$949
$1,200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) has a price of $949 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,200.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
6.5
7.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be good for productivity, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus PG27AQN (IPS) | LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$949 | $1,200 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | OLED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | W-OLED | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 32 | N/A | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 974:1 | Inf:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 414 nits | 275 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 644 nits | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | Yes | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 98.5 % | 98.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 5.6 ms | 0.3 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 360 Hz | 48 - 240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 9.5/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.1/10 | 9.9/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 140 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Semi-Gloss | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.9/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 8/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 3 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
IGN
Matthew Smith | March 2023
"The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN is a motion clarity marvel. It’s the first 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor on the market, and also the first to use an Ultrafast IPS display. These advancements provide outstanding motion clarity across a broad range of refresh rates. Unfortunately, the monitor’s motion clarity does nothing for its image quality, which is just ok. To be clear, it’s a very nice looking monitor in many situations. However, the monitor’s contrast ratio is rather low. And while it can reach high levels of brightness in HDR, it lacks the nuance and contrast required to look great in HDR games."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus PG27AQN (IPS) vs. LG 38WN95C (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PG27AQN (IPS) vs. MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG27AQN (IPS) vs. Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) vs. Dell Alienware AW3225QF (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) vs. Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) vs. Gigabyte FO32U2P (QD-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
