If you're a competitive gamer looking for top refresh rates, the Asus PG27AQN would be a superior choice, providing smoother gameplay with its higher refresh capabilities. However, if you prioritize budget and are more into casual gaming, media consumption, or productivity tasks, the Dell S3222DGM would be more cost-effective, offering a larger screen and a high contrast ratio for deeper blacks, albeit with lower peak brightness and less suitability for high frame rate gaming. Neither monitor is ideal for HDR gaming or high-level photo and video editing due to their limited HDR and color performance. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Dell S3222DGM (VA)
Very good contrast
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.6/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
5.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.6 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is poor.
Productivity
6.5/10
5.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is poor.
Cost
$949
$250
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) has a price of $949 and the Dell S3222DGM (VA) costs $250.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.7/10
6.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4365:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
92.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) and Asus PG27AQN (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4365:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Asus PG27AQN (IPS) to be only fair for media consumption, while the Dell S3222DGM (VA) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and the Dell S3222DGM (VA) compare to other monitors
"The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN is a motion clarity marvel. It’s the first 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor on the market, and also the first to use an Ultrafast IPS display. These advancements provide outstanding motion clarity across a broad range of refresh rates. Unfortunately, the monitor’s motion clarity does nothing for its image quality, which is just ok. To be clear, it’s a very nice looking monitor in many situations. However, the monitor’s contrast ratio is rather low. And while it can reach high levels of brightness in HDR, it lacks the nuance and contrast required to look great in HDR games."
"Aside from its omission of HDR, the Dell S3222DGM has no flaws of consequence. For a surprisingly low price, it delivers premium quality gaming performance with 165 Hz and Adaptive-Sync through a high-contrast curved VA panel with a wide and accurate color gamut."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.