If you prioritize high-contrast visuals and HDR gaming and media consumption, the Asus PG27AQDM with its OLED panel excels at delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors, and it performs exceptionally well for casual gaming. However, it has limited productivity capabilities due to its smaller size and aspect ratio. Conversely, the ViewSonic XG341C-2K offers a wider screen and aspect ratio, making it a better choice for productivity and multitasking, also boasting a high-quality VA Mini LED panel that is superior for print photo editing. Keep in mind that the ViewSonic has a larger screen which may enhance immersion in games and media at the expense of higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED)
Good text clarity
Very good brightness
Best in class response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.6/10
5.4/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
1.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,200 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
6.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$899
$1,499
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) has a price of $899 and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) costs $1,499.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
200Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
963 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
97.2 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
97.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) to be best in class for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) is excellent.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
7.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
720 nits
963 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) are both good for media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG341C-2K (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"It’s hard to find any fault with the Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM. Yes it’s expensive, but it’s incredibly good. With a stunning image and next-level video performance, it’s one of the very best gaming monitors I’ve ever reviewed."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.