If you're a serious gamer who values top-notch contrast and response times, and are willing to invest in premium features, the Asus PG27AQDM with W-OLED technology offers superior performance, especially for HDR gaming. However, if you're on a budget and prioritize value over cutting-edge tech, the Innocn 27G1S will be more affordable and still provides a very good experience for gaming with respectable image quality. For general productivity or if high color accuracy for professional photo editing is critical, the Asus is a better option, albeit at a higher cost. Neither are ideal for media consumption, but the Asus would outperform the Innocn due to its superior brightness and contrast. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Excellent response time
Advantages of the Innocn 27G1S (VA)
The Innocn 27G1S (VA) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
6.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
963 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
97.2 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Innocn 27G1S (VA) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
8.6/10
8.0/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and Innocn 27G1S (VA) are both very good for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
162 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
963 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Innocn 27G1S (VA) is only fair.
Cost
$899
$270
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) has a price of $899 and the Innocn 27G1S (VA) costs $270.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 27G1S (VA) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Innocn 27G1S (VA) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
5.8/10
6.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Innocn 27G1S (VA) to be only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) is poor.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and Innocn 27G1S (VA) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and Innocn 27G1S (VA) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQDM (W-OLED) and the Innocn 27G1S (VA) compare to other monitors
"It’s hard to find any fault with the Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM. Yes it’s expensive, but it’s incredibly good. With a stunning image and next-level video performance, it’s one of the very best gaming monitors I’ve ever reviewed."
"The monitor is a sweet spot for gamers who want something faster than 165 Hz while keeping the benefits of fast response times and relative affordability. The VA panel is now more competitive against many IPS options."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.