Choosing the Asus PG279QM means you value high refresh rates for very smooth gameplay in competitive gaming, as well as a stand with more adjustability, and a higher color accuracy for tasks like digital photo editing. On the other hand, the Gigabyte FI32Q-X offers a larger screen for a more immersive experience, also with high refresh rates for competitive gaming, but at a lower cost, and includes additional HDMI 2.1 ports for more connectivity options. If budget is a concern and you prefer a larger display, Gigabyte might be the better option, but if you prioritize higher performance in competitive gaming and color-accurate work, then the Asus could be worth the extra investment. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG279QM (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
Good brightness
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.0/10
5.3/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
270Hz
7.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 270 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
363 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.4/10
4.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
5.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1147:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
363 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
478 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$749
$500
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) has a price of $749 and the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) costs $500.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.4/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
270Hz
1147:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
363 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
478 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
95.8 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Asus PG279QM (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PG279QM (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG279QM (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG279QM (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG279QM (IPS) and the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Asus ROG Swift PG279QM is one of the best gaming monitors I’ve reviewed, and one of the best all-around displays too. With perfect video processing, smooth gaming performance and tons of rich and accurate color."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
96,500
Recommendations made
14,475
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.