If high-resolution imagery and top-notch color accuracy are critical for tasks like photo editing or watching HDR content, the Asus PA32UCG-K with its superior brightness and color gamut will serve you well, though it's a pricier investment. Conversely, if you're focused on competitive gaming and require ultra-fast response times with very high refresh rates, the Dell AW2524H offers these features at a lower price, but it won't match the image quality and size of the Asus for creative work or immersive media experiences. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Very good color volume
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
8.3/10
6.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
4.4/10
9.5/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.5 ms
48 - 120 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 500 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is poor.
Productivity
9.8/10
4.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.8/10
5.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$2,999
$500
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $2,999 and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) costs $500.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Combining features that designers and content makers need, the Asus ProArt PA32UCG-K Display represents the true cost of accurate colour. It’s expensive, heavy and has weird OSD controls, but the screen is glorious when working with HDR video or game graphics."
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.