If price is a concern, the CoolerMaster GP27U offers excellent performance for its cost and is more affordable than the Asus PA32UCG-K, which demands a higher investment. The Asus, however, provides top-tier brightness and color quality that might be preferred for professional photo and video editing. For serious competitive gamers, the CoolerMaster with its higher refresh rate might be more appealing, while for casual gaming, both are very capable. If you prioritize screen real estate and work productivity, the larger screen size of the Asus could be beneficial. For media consumption, both monitors are great choices with strong HDR capabilities. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED)
Best in class brightness
Advantages of the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED)
Good refresh rate
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Very good contrast
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.4/10
5.9/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 120 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
The CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) and Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
8.8/10
8.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1072:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1550 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are both very good for media consumption, though the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is somewhat better.
Cost
$2,999
$770
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $2,999 and the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) costs $770.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
8.3/10
8.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1072:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1550 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are both very good for casual gaming.
Productivity
9.8/10
9.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are both best in class for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) and the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Combining features that designers and content makers need, the Asus ProArt PA32UCG-K Display represents the true cost of accurate colour. It’s expensive, heavy and has weird OSD controls, but the screen is glorious when working with HDR video or game graphics."
"The Cooler Master Tempest GP27U leaves little to complain about. It delivers a stunning picture with high contrast, brightness, and vivid color. Professional-grade video processing means a superlative gaming experience. And it’s a little less expensive than the competition."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.