A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




S43CG70
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize photo editing and productivity with accurate color representation, the Asus PA329CV has a good screen size and resolution for detailed work, along with a stand to adjust to your comfort. However, for a better entertainment experience, especially in dark rooms where contrast is key, the Samsung S43CG70 offers superior contrast and screen size. The Samsung could also be preferable if you value a more immersive gaming experience, despite its lower refresh rate, due to its larger display and some gaming features. If you're looking to save money and focus on work and casual use, the Asus may suffice, but for high contrast and a large screen in gaming and media, consider investing in the Samsung. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Good contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
S43CG70
7.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is good for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
S43CG70
4.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
60,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
S43CG70
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
103 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is poor.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
S43CG70
$999
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) costs $999.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
S43CG70
No
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
S43CG70
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
S43CG70
6.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
3000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
S43CG70
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
S43CG70
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Samsung S43CG70 (VA Mini LED)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$999
Screen Size
32"43"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMini LED
Screen Sub-type
IPSVA
Local Dimming Zones
N/A512

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:13000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A60,144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
6/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI103 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.8/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/106.8/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo