A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




45GR95QE-B
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize a more immersive gaming experience with smoother action, deeper blacks, and higher contrast, and are willing to pay for premium features, the LG monitor with its OLED panel is an excellent choice for both gaming and HDR content. However, for tasks that require accurate color representation like digital photo editing, the Asus monitor is a solid performer and will be more budget-friendly. Keep in mind that while the LG excels in overall gaming performance, its text clarity and brightness for productivity tasks are not as strong as what the Asus offers. If cost and sharp text for productivity are more important to you than the gaming advantages of the LG, then the Asus might be the better pick. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
7.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is good for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
5.3
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
3.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
45GR95QE-B
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$1,700
Screen Size
32"45"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits203 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown665 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %99.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms2.7 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
6/108.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/104/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo