A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize digital photo editing and productivity tasks, the Asus PA329CV, being less expensive, offers good color accuracy and a large screen for your work. However, the LG 32GQ950 would be a better choice for competitive gaming and media consumption due to its higher refresh rate, better peak brightness for HDR, and support for variable refresh rate to reduce screen tearing. However, the LG's advances in gaming and HDR capabilities come with a higher price tag. Consider the importance of gaming performance versus the cost savings and productivity focus when making your choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GQ950 (IPS).
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good refresh rate
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
32GQ950
4.7
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.8 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
32GQ950
$930
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) costs $930.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
32GQ950
6.2
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GQ950 (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
32GQ950
8.1
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GQ950 (IPS) to be very good for productivity, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
32GQ950
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
32GQ950
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
32GQ950
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
32GQ950
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
32GQ950
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GQ950 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$930
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A32

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1921:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits367 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown1007 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %99.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms5.8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 160 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107/10
Ghosting Score
6/108.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteSemi-Gloss
Text Clarity Score
7.9/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo