A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




32Q1U
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're focused on digital photo editing without breaking the bank, the Asus PA329CV offers a good balance of quality and affordability. However, if high contrast and print photo editing are priorities, and you're willing to spend more, the Innocn 32Q1U excels with superior contrast and color depth. Neither are optimal for gaming due to low refresh rates. For media consumption, the Innocn's OLED panel provides a richer viewing experience, although it's at a premium price. If your work involves long hours of text-heavy tasks, the Asus with its better text clarity could reduce eye strain and is easier on the wallet. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
32Q1U
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
32Q1U
4.7
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
32Q1U
6.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
32Q1U
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
32Q1U
$1,000
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) costs $1,000.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
32Q1U
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
32Q1U
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
32Q1U
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
32Q1U
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$1,000
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms0.1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
11

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo