A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
The Asus PA329CV offers a higher resolution which is great for productivity and digital photo editing due to clearer details and more screen real estate. However, the Gigabyte M32Q, while having a lower resolution, features better gaming performance with a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, leading to smoother gameplay and reduced ghosting for a more enjoyable experience in both casual and competitive games. If gaming is your priority and you're looking to save some money, the Gigabyte M32Q is a better fit. If screen clarity for work and editing is more important and you're okay with spending more, the Asus PA329CV would be preferable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
- Good for productivity
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
- Good refresh rate
- Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8
4.7
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 170 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
The Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.7
5.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.5
5.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
460 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$529
$455
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) costs $455.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1195:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
333 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
460 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus PA329CV (IPS) | Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$529 | $455 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 170Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 1195:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 350 nits | 333 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | Unknown | 460 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 99.6 % | 100.6 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 15 ms | 6.1 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | N/A | 20 - 170 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 6/10 | 8.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 137 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 1 | 1 | |
Shopping
Gigabyte M32Q (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Display Ninja
Rob Shafer | July 2023
"Thanks to its IPS panel with a wide color gamut and fast pixel response time speed, the Gigabyte M32Q offers both an immersive and responsive gaming experience. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, plenty of connectivity options, and a lot of useful features – all at a reasonable price."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
VS
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
VS
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. Dell AW2524H (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M32Q (IPS) vs. MSI MAG274QRF-QD (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
