If you prioritize high-resolution images for digital photo editing, print photo editing, and better image clarity for productivity tasks, the Asus PA329C with its larger screen and higher resolution might be the right choice, despite its higher price. However, if you're focused on competitive gaming, the Dell AW2524H offers superior performance with its extremely high refresh rate and features geared towards reducing ghosting, at a lower price point. The Dell monitor won’t be as suited for tasks requiring accurate color reproduction, like professional photo editing. Neither of these monitors are the best option for HDR gaming or media consumption. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329C (IPS)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
9.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.5 ms
24 - 76 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 500 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA329C (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
7.8/10
4.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.7/10
5.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,000
$500
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Asus PA329C (IPS) has a price of $1,000 and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) costs $500.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
6.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Dell AW2524H (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329C (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329C (IPS) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329C (IPS) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329C (IPS) and Dell AW2524H (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329C (IPS) and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Even at 32 inches, it’s just five inches larger than most professional display monitors, the ASUS ProArt Display PA329CV monitor seems a lot bigger. The color accuracy on the unit I received was excellent, and viewing high-resolution image files on it was pleasing to the eyes. It’s Calman verified, so you can be assured of Hollywood studio-quality color straight out of the box. With multiple USB ports on the monitor and HDMI and USB-C connectivity options, it stands up to the well-established Benq PhotoVue series of monitors."
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,400
Recommendations made
17,760
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.