The Asus PA329C excels in digital photo editing and print photo editing, with excellent color accuracy and a larger screen, making it well-suited for professional creative work. However, its lower refresh rate and response time make it less ideal for competitive gaming. On the other hand, the Asus PG27AQN, while often significantly less expensive, offers a higher refresh rate and is designed with gaming in mind, delivering a smoother experience for competitive gameplay. It also has some capacity for casual creative work but might not perform as well as the PA329C in tasks requiring precise color reproduction. Neither is particularly recommended for HDR gaming or media consumption. If budget is a concern and gaming is a priority, the PG27AQN is a strong choice; for professional-level photo editing with deeper pockets, the PA329C would be preferable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329C (IPS)
Good for productivity
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
974:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
414 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
644 nits
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
92.0 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329C (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
9.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
10.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.6 ms
24 - 76 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
414 nits
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA329C (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
7.8/10
6.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.7/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
974:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
414 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
644 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Asus PA329C (IPS) and Asus PG27AQN (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption, though the Asus PA329C (IPS) is somewhat better.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA329C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Cost
$1,000
$949
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The Asus PA329C (IPS) has a price of $1,000 and the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) costs $949.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329C (IPS) and Asus PG27AQN (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329C (IPS) and Asus PG27AQN (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329C (IPS) and the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Even at 32 inches, it’s just five inches larger than most professional display monitors, the ASUS ProArt Display PA329CV monitor seems a lot bigger. The color accuracy on the unit I received was excellent, and viewing high-resolution image files on it was pleasing to the eyes. It’s Calman verified, so you can be assured of Hollywood studio-quality color straight out of the box. With multiple USB ports on the monitor and HDMI and USB-C connectivity options, it stands up to the well-established Benq PhotoVue series of monitors."
"The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN is a motion clarity marvel. It’s the first 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor on the market, and also the first to use an Ultrafast IPS display. These advancements provide outstanding motion clarity across a broad range of refresh rates. Unfortunately, the monitor’s motion clarity does nothing for its image quality, which is just ok. To be clear, it’s a very nice looking monitor in many situations. However, the monitor’s contrast ratio is rather low. And while it can reach high levels of brightness in HDR, it lacks the nuance and contrast required to look great in HDR games."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.