A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




XG272 2K OLED
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and want a smoother experience with less motion blur, the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED with its high refresh rate would be a better fit. For those focused on digital photo editing and print photo work, the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) with its strong color accuracy would be more suitable, despite its higher cost. Both monitors have OLED panels, offering deep blacks and excellent contrast, but the Asus has a higher resolution which is great for productivity and media consumption, making it a versatile but pricier choice. The ViewSonic, however, offers better value for gamers who still want the benefits of OLED technology. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
9.6
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
40 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
$900
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) costs $900.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
8.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are both very good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
XG272 2K OLED
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)ViewSonic XG272 2K OLED (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$900
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits450 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.02 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A40 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
30
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo