A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




34M2C8600
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize high color accuracy for tasks like digital and print photo editing, the Asus PA27DCE with its exceptional color depth and contrast could be a superior option, although it comes at a premium price and is less ideal for gaming due to its lower refresh rate. On the other hand, the Phillips 34M2C8600 offers a wider screen and high color accuracy as well, alongside a better gaming experience thanks to its good refresh rate and variable refresh rate range, making it a versatile choice for both productivity and immersive gaming or media consumption, all at a lower price point. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
Yes
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
9.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
5.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$800
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %148.8 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
32
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo