A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize professional use such as digital photo editing or any work related to accurate color representation, the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) with its high color accuracy could be a worthwhile investment despite the higher price. On the other hand, the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) also offers good color accuracy and is capable for HDR gaming and media consumption at a lower cost, making it a more budget-friendly option while still delivering a quality display. Neither is ideal for competitive gaming due to their poor refresh rates, but for casual gaming, both are sufficient. If budget is a concern and your needs don't demand the absolute best color precision, the Phillips could be the better choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED).
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
5.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
6.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$800
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
32
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo