A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




MPG 491CQP
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If high-quality color reproduction is a priority for you, such as for professional photo editing, the Asus PA27DCE with its superior color accuracy and suitability for print photo editing could be worth the extra cost. However, if you prefer a much larger screen for an immersive gaming and media consumption experience and don't mind sacrificing some textual clarity, the MSI MPG 491CQP offers a wider, curved display and excellent HDR performance for less money. Bear in mind for competitive gaming, the MSI's broader VRR range and faster response time give it an edge, while the Asus might not be as smooth a performer due to its poorer refresh rate and response time. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
$1,100
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) costs $1,100.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
Yes
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
9.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
5120 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
5.5
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
MPG 491CQP
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)MSI MPG 491CQP (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$1,100
Screen Size
27"49"
Resolution
3840 x 21605120 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz144Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %146 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
30
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo