A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize excellent contrast and color depth for tasks like HDR gaming, media consumption, and print photo editing, the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) offers these strengths at a lower cost compared to the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED). However, the LG has slightly higher peak brightness which might be preferable for some HDR content, but both monitors have limitations in brightness and refresh rate that are not ideal for competitive gaming. For productivity, both options offer similar screen resolution and size, with the Asus providing slightly better value for money due to its lower price point. If your focus is on visual quality for professional photo editing over gaming, and you are looking to save money, the Asus may be the better option for you. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good for media consumption
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
27EP950
7.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
27EP950
No
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
27EP950
No
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
27EP950
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
27EP950
5.4
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
27EP950
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
27EP950
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
27EP950
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$3,000
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms1 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
31
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
126,800
Recommendations made
19,020
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo