A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




XB273U F
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If budget is a concern and competitive gaming is your priority, the Asus XB273U F with its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support is your better option. However, if you prioritize image quality, particularly for HDR content and photo editing where deep blacks and color accuracy are key, the Asus PA27DCE with its OLED panel is superior. The OLED monitor won't be as suitable for fast-paced gaming due to its lower refresh rate and motion handling. For general productivity and media consumption, both are good choices, but the OLED will provide better contrast and color performance while the IPS will offer a more budget-friendly option with adequate performance for most tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Good text clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
XB273U F
7.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1242:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
XB273U F
9.5
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
XB273U F
6.3
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1242:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
488 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
468 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
XB273U F
$1,100
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the Asus XB273U F (IPS) costs $1,100.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
XB273U F
No
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus XB273U F (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
XB273U F
6.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
XB273U F
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
XB273U F
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
XB273U F
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Asus XB273U F (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the Asus XB273U F (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Asus XB273U F (IPS)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Asus XB273U F (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$1,100
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11242:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits488 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown468 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99.6 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms5.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
5/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
10/108.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/107/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
32
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo