If budget is a priority, the Asus PA279CV is a cost-effective choice suitable for digital photo editing and productivity tasks, with very good text quality and image clarity. However, the Asus PA32DC's premium Inkjet OLED panel delivers unparalleled contrast and color depth, making it a superb option for HDR gaming, media consumption, and print photo editing. Its larger screen also enhances the viewing experience. Gamers focused on competitive play may not find either monitor ideal due to their poorer refresh rates and response times. The PA32DC is less suited for tasks requiring crisp text due to its lower pixels per inch. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA279CV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class contrast
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
9.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
75Hz
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
7.9/10
6.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.6/10
9.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$399
$3,499
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) has a price of $399 and the Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) costs $3,499.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
4.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
75Hz
17.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) and Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA279CV (IPS) and Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CV (IPS) and Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA279CV (IPS) and Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA279CV (IPS) and the Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED) compare to other monitors
"Asus’ ProArt PA279CV is a sensible choice for content creators who want a color accurate 4K monitor but don’t want to clean out their savings account. It edges out alternatives like the BenQ PD2720U and Dell S2722QC in brightness and contrast without giving up ground on connectivity or menu options."
"All in all, the Asus PA32DC OLED is a superbly crafted display for experts in their craft. From filmmakers to colorists and everyone in between, this OLED display comes with just about everything that’ll satisfy professionals and enthusiasts. The undisputed champion of content creation monitors might still be the Apple Pro Display XDR for some, but the Asus PA32DC OLED puts up a heck of a fight for several grand less."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.