Given your interest in the Apple Studio Display and the LG 27GR95QE, consider the following: the Apple Studio Display offers a higher resolution which is excellent for productivity and media consumption, providing exceptional text clarity and image sharpness. The LG, on the other hand, boasts an OLED panel with infinite contrast and superb color depth, making it better suited for HDR gaming and enjoying high-contrast media. If competitive gaming is a priority, the LG's higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate range provide a smoother experience with less ghosting than the Apple monitor. For professional photo editing, both displays cover a wide color gamut, but if your work demands the highest color accuracy, the Apple display has a slight edge, particularly in print photo editing. If budget is a concern, the LG offers a competitively high performance at a significantly lower price, but if you're drawn to the Apple ecosystem and prioritize higher resolution and superior text quality for productivity tasks, the Studio Display could be worth the investment. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
Best in class for productivity
Best in class text clarity
Best in class image clarity
Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
9.5/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
656 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
8.3/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
9.5/10
5.8/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$1,599
$1,000
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,000.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Media Consumption
7.0/10
7.5/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
656 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and Apple Studio Display (IPS) are both good for media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The LG 27GR95QE-B is a stellar display that makes 1440p again the PC gaming sweet spot due to its high 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic latency. However, its low overall brightness and lack of onboard settings keep it from being great."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.