If image clarity during productivity tasks such as digital photo editing is your priority and you are willing to invest in a premium product, the Apple Studio Display is an excellent choice. However, it performs poorly in gaming scenarios due to its lower refresh rate. The Innocn 27M2V, on the other hand, offers good performance for gaming with a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, better peak brightness for HDR content, and is more affordable. It is also suitable for productivity tasks and photo editing, though it may not match the Apple display's text clarity and image quality. For a well-rounded monitor that balances price and performance across multiple uses, including casual and competitive gaming, productivity, and media consumption, the Innocn is a compelling choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
Best in class text clarity
Best in class image clarity
Advantages of the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Very good for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Very good contrast
Very good brightness
Very good color volume
Good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
8.2/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
80.2 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
5.9/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and Apple Studio Display (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
8.3/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1098:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
790 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1175 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is good.
Cost
$1,599
$730
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $730.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
9.5/10
9.9/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
164 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) and Apple Studio Display (IPS) are both best in class for productivity.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Thanks to the wide color gamut, games and videos will look even more vibrant than the standard wide gamut displays (such as LG’s Nano IPS with 98% DCI-P3 and ~90% Adobe RGB, for instance), especially when it comes to blue, cyan and green shades. All in all, if you want a 27″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with a mini LED FALD backlight, the Innocn 27M2V is currently the best model available."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.