Opting for the Apple Studio Display gives you a higher screen resolution for sharper image quality, which is especially beneficial for productivity tasks and digital photo editing due to its superb text and image clarity. However, it falls short in the gaming department with poor refresh rates and lack of variable refresh rate (VRR) support, thus not the best for casual or competitive gaming. On the flip side, the Asus PA279CV offers a lower resolution but still adequate for most tasks, has an adjustable stand for ergonomics, and its VRR support alongside lower response time is more suitable for gaming, albeit at a midrange price point. The Apple display excels in color-critical work like photo editing, while the Asus is a versatile choice balancing work and play at a more accessible price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Best in class text clarity
Best in class image clarity
Good brightness
Advantages of the Asus PA279CV (IPS)
The Asus PA279CV (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Apple Studio Display (IPS).
Key differences
Productivity
9.5/10
7.9/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is best in class for productivity, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is good.
Cost
$1,599
$399
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the Asus PA279CV (IPS) costs $399.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
5.8/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
920:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
80.6 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Apple Studio Display (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
4.9/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
17.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 60 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
6.6/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
920:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
376 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
436 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Apple Studio Display (IPS) to be good for media consumption, while the Asus PA279CV (IPS) is only fair.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Asus PA279CV (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the Asus PA279CV (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Asus’ ProArt PA279CV is a sensible choice for content creators who want a color accurate 4K monitor but don’t want to clean out their savings account. It edges out alternatives like the BenQ PD2720U and Dell S2722QC in brightness and contrast without giving up ground on connectivity or menu options."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.