If you prioritize an expansive gaming and media consumption experience, the AOC PD49 with its wider screen and superior contrast might be a better choice. However, if you're focused on a mix of productivity and gaming, and prefer a more budget-friendly option, the Dell Alienware is more suitable with its high refresh rate, good color accuracy, and smaller size which is more practical for everyday use. The Dell Alienware also has better ergonomics with an adjustable stand, making it a wiser pick if you spend long hours at your desk. On the other hand, for immersive gaming, the AOC's large, curved display and higher brightness will stand out, especially in darker environments. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC PD49 (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Best in class contrast
Best in class brightness
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.9/10
6.4/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
280Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1020:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
384 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
672 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
6.7/10
8.6/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
280Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.6 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 280 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
384 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is only fair.
Productivity
5.9/10
6.4/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.8/10
6.0/10
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1020:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
384 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
672 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$2,350
$429
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) has a price of $2,350 and the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) costs $429.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC PD49 (QD-OLED) and the Dell Alienware AW2723DF (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Put all the pieces together, the high quality IPS image quality, the punchy backlight, the good response and the buttery smooth 280Hz refresh and you have a pretty outstanding gaming panel that's also decent for general computing duties thanks to the 1440p resolution."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.