A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG456UCZD
Company ProductName Specs




G274QPF-QD
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer valuing fast response times and excellent contrast, and don't mind spending more, the AOC monitor's OLED technology is superior. However, for casual gaming, general productivity, and photo editing where color accuracy across a wide gamut is important, the MSI monitor provides good capabilities at a budget-friendly price. The MSI's smaller screen might be better for a multi-monitor setup, while the AOC's ultrawide screen is immersive for gaming and watching movies, despite its lower clarity and text quality. Neither is great for HDR video editing, but the AOC supports HDR gaming and media consumption better. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
  • The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

3.8
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,400
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
$270
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) costs $270.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.0
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 170 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.9
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
G274QPF-QD
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,400
$270
Screen Size
44.5"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz170Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %154 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 170 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
10/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/107/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
30
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo