A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG456UCZD
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for a larger screen, the AOC AG456UCZD offers a high refresh rate and excellent performance for fast-paced games, while also being less expensive than the LG option. However, for digital photo editing or if high resolution is a priority, the LG 27EP950 has superior image clarity and is well-suited for media consumption, despite its higher cost. The AOC falls short in productivity and media consumption performance, whereas the LG might not satisfy the needs of competitive gaming as well as the AOC does. Choose the AOC if gaming and budget are priorities, or the LG for sharper images and professional creative work. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.0
AG456UCZD
27EP950
5.4
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

3.8
AG456UCZD
27EP950
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.9
AG456UCZD
27EP950
7.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,400
AG456UCZD
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
27EP950
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
27EP950
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
AG456UCZD
27EP950
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG456UCZD
27EP950
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG456UCZD
27EP950
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,400
$3,000
Screen Size
44.5"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
01
HDMI 2.1 Ports
30
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo