A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG276QZD
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize high refresh rates for competitive gaming and are content with a smaller screen and lower resolution, the AOC AG276QZD offers these advantages at a lower price. The larger screen and higher resolution of the LG 32GS95UE enhance productivity and media consumption but come at a premium cost. Both monitors offer OLED technology with infinite contrast and a wide color gamut, making them great for vibrant visuals and HDR content. Shift toward the AOC for budget-friendly gaming or the LG for a more immersive work and entertainment experience. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

9.6
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
6.2
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

5.7
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
7.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
8.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$700
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
$1,200
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,200.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
No
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
Yes
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
96.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG276QZD
32GS95UE
No
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$1,200
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
284 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
379 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo