If you prioritize high refresh rates for competitive gaming and are content with a smaller screen and lower resolution, the AOC AG276QZD offers these advantages at a lower price. The larger screen and higher resolution of the LG 32GS95UE enhance productivity and media consumption but come at a premium cost. Both monitors offer OLED technology with infinite contrast and a wide color gamut, making them great for vibrant visuals and HDR content. Shift toward the AOC for budget-friendly gaming or the LG for a more immersive work and entertainment experience. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
Good for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
6.2/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.
Productivity
5.7/10
7.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.8/10
8.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$700
$1,200
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,200.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.7/10
9.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
96.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.