A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·
If you prioritize high refresh rates and smooth performance in fast-paced games, the AOC AG276QZD could serve you well, especially if you engage in competitive gaming and are on a budget. However, its smaller screen and lower resolution compared to the LG 32EP950 might limit your field of view and detail in graphics. On the other hand, the LG monitor, with its larger screen size, higher resolution, and superior color accuracy, would be a better fit if you're into HDR gaming, media consumption, or print photo editing despite its higher cost. But note that for competitive gaming, the LG's lower refresh rate could be a drawback. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
- Best in class for competitive gaming
- Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED)
- Excellent for media consumption
- Good image clarity
- Good brightness
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.6
4.3
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) is poor.
Productivity
5.7
6.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.8
9.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$700
$3,220
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) costs $3,220.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.7
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
96.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) | LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$700 | $3,220 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | OLED | OLED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | W-OLED | Inkjet OLED | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 60Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | Inf:1 | Inf:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 284 nits | 540 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 379 nits | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | Yes | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 99 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 0.3 ms | 1 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 240 Hz | N/A | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9.9/10 | 9.6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 108 PPI | 139 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.6/10 | 6.9/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
TFT Central
Simon Baker | May 2021
"This screen is aimed at professional users, content creation and HDR video production. The OLED panel offers really great picture quality with bright, vivid colours, true deep blacks and infinite contrast ratio for SDR and HDR. The semi-glossy screen coating does add to the picture quality and feel of the screen as well."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. Pixio PX277 OLED Max (W-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) vs. LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) vs. Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED) vs. Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
