A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer, the Acer XB323U-GX, with its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate range, offers smoother and more responsive gameplay, but it comes at a premium price. For productivity tasks like photo editing, both monitors provide good color accuracy, with the Acer slightly edge out in wider color coverage. If budget is a concern and you're focused on productivity and unique screen real-estate, the LG DualUp may be appealing with its taller aspect ratio. It's not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption, while the Acer provides a decent experience in that aspect despite not excelling. For casual gaming and media consumption, the LG can serve well with good image clarity, but the Acer might give you a better experience if you can justify the cost. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
6.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
$650
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $650.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
No
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
4.9
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$650
Screen Size
32"28"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 2880
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo