A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




45GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you are involved in digital photo editing or print photo editing, the Acer XB323U-GX with its high color accuracy might serve you well, though it's not the best for HDR gaming or media consumption. On the other hand, if you have a higher budget and prefer an immersive experience with high contrast and are interested in HDR gaming, the LG 45GS95QE with its OLED technology and wider screen could be the choice for you, albeit with a heavier price tag and possibly less clarity in text due to its larger screen and lower pixels per inch. Both have high refresh rates suitable for casual gaming, but if competitive gaming is a focus, their capabilities are relatively equal. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
6.0
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
3.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
Yes
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
45GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$1,700
Screen Size
32"45"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/104/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo