A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize high refresh rates and value a larger screen size, the Acer XB323U-GX with its IPS panel could be worth the premium price for both competitive gaming and productivity tasks due to its wider color gamut, making it suitable for digital photo editing. On the other hand, the LG 27GS95QE with its W-OLED panel offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and superior image clarity at a lower cost, making it excellent for casual and HDR gaming as well as media consumption, though it may not be the best choice for tasks that demand the most accurate color representation. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
9.5
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.5 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
$650
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $650.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
Yes
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
No
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
27GS95QE
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$650
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits196 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nits636 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms0.5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/109.8/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/106.7/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo