A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




34M2C8600
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're looking for the best competitive gaming experience, the Acer X34V with its excellent response time and good refresh rate would be a smart pick. However, the Philips 34M2C8600 shines in HDR video editing and print photo editing due to its superior color gamut and image clarity. For casual gaming and media consumption, both are strong contenders, but the Philips edges out with better color accuracy and volume. If budget is a constraint, you'll find the Acer offers a similar size and resolution, making it a cost-effective choice without significant sacrifices in gaming and productivity. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
34M2C8600
5.8
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Cost

$700
X34V
34M2C8600
$800
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
34M2C8600
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
34M2C8600
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
34M2C8600
9.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
34M2C8600
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
34M2C8600
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
34M2C8600
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Phillips 34M2C8600 (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$800
Screen Size
34"34"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %148.8 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
106,100
Recommendations made
15,915
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo