A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you primarily enjoy immersive gaming or watch a lot of movies and want a wider and more captivating experience, the Acer X34V with its ultra-wide display and higher refresh rate could be the better choice. However, if color accuracy for professional photo editing is a priority, the Philips 27E1N8900 offers superior color gamut coverage that might make it more suitable for those tasks, despite its smaller screen and potentially lower refresh rate which is less ideal for gaming. Keep in mind, the Philips also has a higher resolution, which is great for clarity but can be more demanding on your hardware for gaming. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
27E1N8900
5.9
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
27E1N8900
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$700
X34V
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
27E1N8900
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
27E1N8900
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
27E1N8900
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
27E1N8900
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$800
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo