A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




45GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a high-quality gaming and media experience while keeping costs reasonable, the Acer X34V is a solid choice with great image clarity and color depth, suitable for HDR games. It also supports a wide variable refresh rate for smooth gameplay. However, if you're a competitive gamer seeking the highest refresh rate and can afford a premium, the LG 45GS95QE offers a very high refresh rate but doesn't excel in overall image quality or media consumption compared to the Acer. For productivity and digital photo editing, both have good color coverage, but the higher price of the LG might not justify the gains in competitive gaming over the Acer's satisfactory performance in various tasks. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
45GS95QE
6.0
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
45GS95QE
3.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
45GS95QE
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$700
X34V
45GS95QE
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
45GS95QE
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
45GS95QE
9.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
45GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
45GS95QE
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
45GS95QE
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 45GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$1,700
Screen Size
34"45"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/104/10
Image Clarity Score
7/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo