A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If immersive gaming and media consumption are your priorities, the Acer X34V, with its wider aspect ratio and superior contrast, offers a standout experience, especially for HDR content. The LG 32GQ950, however, has a higher resolution and may be better for tasks that require more screen real estate like productivity work, despite its higher price. The LG's also offers a high-quality image, but if budget is a concern and you prefer an ultrawide format for gaming or viewing, the Acer provides a compelling option with significant cost savings. Neither is optimal for professional photo and video editing due to limited color gamut coverage. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
  • Very good for productivity
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
32GQ950
6.2
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
32GQ950
8.1
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
32GQ950
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$700
X34V
32GQ950
$930
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) costs $930.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
32GQ950
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
32GQ950
4.7
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.8 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
32GQ950
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
32GQ950
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
32GQ950
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 32GQ950 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$930
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A32

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1921:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits367 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits1007 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %99.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms5.8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz20 - 160 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/107/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteSemi-Gloss
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo