A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If competitive gaming is a priority, the Acer X34V with its wider screen, higher refresh rate, and variable refresh rate support would suit you well, but its larger size and lower resolution may not be ideal for productivity tasks. On the other hand, the LG 27EP950's higher resolution and smaller screen offer sharper images and better clarity for productivity and digital photo editing, alongside excellent color performance for HDR gaming and media. However, its lower refresh rate and absence of variable refresh rate support make it less optimal for competitive gaming. The Acer is a better value for those focused on gaming and entertainment, while the LG is geared towards professionals in digital content creation needing precise color accuracy. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
X34V
27EP950
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
27EP950
7.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$700
X34V
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
27EP950
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
27EP950
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
27EP950
5.4
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
27EP950
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
27EP950
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
27EP950
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$3,000
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nitsN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
11
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo